It's so devastating you can't find it anywhere. You can't find it outside of a little blurb
on CBS. You can't find it anywhere after Reuters publishes it. Fox has got it. I've got it. Fox had it last
night. This whole Benghazi thing is
blown wide open, and nobody's talking about it. Let me give you the overview of
this, and then we'll set it aside for just a second. I want to do a couple things first and we'll
come back to it. But the latest shoe to
drop in the Benghazi disaster -- and this, to me, is huge. It is overwhelmingly huge. This dwarfs Watergate, weapons of mass
destruction, whatever. I mean, that
wasn't even a controversy or a scandal.
This dwarfs Iran-Contra, about which the media spent three solid years
trying to take out Ronald Reagan. The
latest shoe to drop in the Benghazi disaster is the news that the State
Department was e-mailing about the attack on the consulate and the terrorists
who they thought were behind it within two hours, and the e-mails went to the
Situation Room of the White House. Obama knew.
Now, the regime's excuse is, well, there's all kinds of
stuff coming in there, and it took awhile for it to be sifted. They tried this excuse when we were told that
the CIA station chief had sent an e-mail.
This is the second bit of evidence now that the White House was told
practically immediately what was going on and who was behind it. But the news now is that we have a terror
group, Ansar al-Sharia, whatever, claiming credit for it, within two hours. They were holding up their hands saying: Hey,
look over here, it's us. And, by the
way, it isn't a video that has us mad.
Oh, and, by the way, we're just doing this since it's 9/11 and we know
we can get away with it 'cause we hate you.
Folks, this is disqualifying to me, and it is being swept
under the rug. You won't find news of
this in the New York Times. You don't
find CNN covering it. You will not find
MSNBC covering it. They are covering
this up. They are burying this. They're trying to do everything they can to
make it look like it isn't any big deal.
The White House had little response, "Well, there's so much stuff
coming in here, it's impossible to keep up with." The State Department was e-mailing within two
hours of this attack right to the Situation Room in the White House, and they were
telling the White House the terror group they thought was behind it because the
terror group was claiming credit, claiming responsibility.
Now, the attack lasted for five hours, a total of seven
hours this attack lasted. Two of the
four Americans were killed in the final hours.
There was plenty of time to take action to save some of these
people. And yet I remember Obama in the
second debate righteously indignant, (imitating Obama) "Governor Romney,
if you think that I would have done nothing, let Americans die, that is
offensive." It's exactly what
happened. It is precisely what
happened. And even if you want to say,
"Well, maybe it didn't reach all the way up to Obama." So? It
reached somebody. They're sitting in the
White House. You've got to put yourself
there. You're in the White House. You know what's going on because earlier in
the day in Cairo all kinds of hell broke loose after we issued an apology for
something that hadn't yet happened. Then
it really breaks loose in Benghazi.
So you know it's 9/11, you're on alert anyway. You find out what's happening, and you don't
do anything. You're told that there is
an attack by a terror group going on in our consulate in Benghazi, and you
don't do anything, and you don't pass it on to Obama. Keep a sharp eye on Hillary Clinton on this,
because I will lay you a dollar to a doughnut that whenever this is exposed,
she will have covered her tracks, and probably somewhere in a file waiting to
be discovered, is that she took every bit of action she could to avenge this
and was turned down. She alerted the
White House. She did everything she was supposed to do. She's falling on the
sword now, but that's for the campaign.
But she's not gonna take the fall for this. Bill Clinton and Hillary are not gonna let
her take the fall for this. Somebody's
gonna take the fall for this at some point.
Now, the weird thing is, again, I want to point out, these
e-mails from the State Department and CIA station chief, there are two sets of
e-mails, folks, within two hours of the attack, going to the White House, and
in both instances the White House said, "Well, we didn't know. There's so
much stuff coming in here." CIA station chief, now the State
Department. Plus they were watching it
on a video. We had a drone. They were watching it. There was live video. They
knew what was going on. And you know
what weird thing is, these e-mails that were going from the CIA station chief
and the e-mails from the State Department the video that was being seen from
the drone, these e-mails made no mention of earlier protests. The e-mails didn't say, "By the way,
there was a protest going on out here earlier today and it's gotten out of hand
and, oh, my God, all hell's breaking loose." There was no mention of a protest in the
e-mail.
And you know what else?
There was no mention of a video in the e-mails. The e-mails didn't say, "There's a video
out there that's got everybody over here all riled up and it's getting out of
control." There was none of
that. There was no protest. There was no
video. Isn't that weird? The president of the United States said it
was a video six times to the UN, and how many times to the people of this
country on the campaign trail? He flew
outta town knowing full well what happened.
He went to bed knowing what happened.
The president of the United States went to bed knowing what
happened. I gotta tell you something
quite telling. I had a conversation with
a couple people last night, and by the way, they're solid, they're with us, ideologically,
politically. The story becomes known and
we start discussing it, "Why wouldn't Obama do anything?"
I said, "You really want to know?"
"Yeah."
Okay, here's why. A,
we asked the Libyans for permission, and they denied us, so we said, "Okay." But the second reason we didn't do anything
is because Obama was putting politics first, and these people said, "I
can't believe that. I just can't believe
it."
"Well, that's your problem because that's exactly what
happened." And I think this is a
problem a lot of people have with this story is they just can't believe that
the president... it's just like... you may get mad at me for bringing this up
but it's worth it, this makes the same point.
Last night Rachel Maddow was on Letterman, and Letterman was feeling
betrayed by Obama because Obama lied about Romney and Detroit in the debate,
and Letterman was very let down over this.
And Letterman said to Maddow, "But it's the president. It's the challenger who lies. The president tells us the truth."
And I said, "Wait.
Did he ever think that about George Bush?"
Did he ever think George Bush, as president, was telling us
the truth.
Probably not.
But it goes to this whole notion that people have a view of
the presidency that they grant to every occupant: honest, trustworthy, puts
America first, would never do anything to harm the country economically or
militarily. There's a brick wall they run up against when you tell them -- and
I found it out last night when I said Obama had created this impression after
getting bin Laden that he had wiped out terrorism.
He had wiped out Al-Qaeda. So what happened couldn't be
terrorism. Putting his political concerns first, that's what people couldn't
believe. So it's a tough thing to persuade really intelligent people. They do
believe it but don't want to. But the president of the United States went to
bed in all likelihood knowing what had happened in Benghazi, and then got up
the next day and lied.
He lied about it and then proceeded to lie for seven or
eight days and sent other members of his regime out to lie, Susan Rice and Jay
Carney. In the real world, a real president would be forcing these people to
resign if he was not leading the charge. If they had gone out and embarrassed
his administration this way, they'd be forced to walk the plank. Remember the
Saturday Night Massacre in 1972?
may not remember that. Richard Nixon told the attorney
general to fire the special prosecutor looking into Watergate or something like
this. Doesn't matter. I don't want to waste time getting into the specifics of
it. The point is, the AG refused to do it. Robert Bork did it. Bork was next in
line. Bork carried out Nixon's order. I was in Pittsburgh. I will never forget.
I was working at the radio station there, KQV.
Everybody went nuts on the following Monday talking about
the Saturday Night Massacre and how outrageous Nixon was and how outrageous
what he had done was in firing all these people, getting rid of all these
people. It was a scandal and so forth. I'm telling you: This dwarfs that. Back
in 1972, that was a huge point of controversy; a gross exercise, people
thought, of presidential power.
It was the president no longer being the president. It was
the president being king. It was the president being dictator and firing people
who might turn up dirt on him. Well, here we have President Obama who went to
bed knowing what happened and lying about it for seven or eight days
thereafter. And, by the way, he continues to, for all intents and purposes. We
had troops available to deal with this.
There were troops an hour away in Italy.
The president might be interested in knowing that we have
these things called "aircraft carriers." Airplanes land on 'em. What
happens is an airplane takes off from an aircraft carrier and goes and attacks
our enemies and takes 'em out. Then it comes back, and it lands back on the
aircraft carrier. We have all those things. Yeah, we have Marines! They still
use bayonets and we still have horseback soldiers and so forth.
That happened in Afghanistan. The president may not have
been aware that he had aircraft carriers in the region that planes land on and
take off from and they go out and complete missions and they come back and they
land. And we got these things they call submarines. They go under the water so
the bad guys can't see 'em. They're in the region, too. We got some naval
assets in that region that could have been used.
They could have been authorized to take action to save the
lives of Americans. Remember: Four dead in a seven-hour attack, two of them
died in the final hours. This government made not one move, with full knowledge
of what was going on, to protect those Americans. We had hundreds of people
watching in real time, folks, as 30 Americans were being attacked for seven
hours.
Nobody rode to their rescue.
It's just maddening. And to have the story basically ignored
and covered up today is evidence to me of just how devastating it is. I think
the regime is barely holding its campaign together. I think this campaign is
leaking. Imagine a dike with all the holes in it, and the holes are the states,
and the regime has got people plugging the holes with fingers and doing
everything they can to stop the flow.
I think they're very close here to being swept away by a
tidal wave. I think everybody involved knows it. That's why they're relying on
dirt. All they got, by the way, is for Chicago to start throwing the dirt. So,
"Hello, Gloria Allred!" and all of this typical smearing. You know,
Obama has an MO, a modus operandi. Go in and find sealed court records involving
your opponent.
Somehow miraculously get them released to embarrass your
opponent. That's how he won two elections in Illinois for state senator and
United States senator. So there's that. That was 6:07 p.m., the relevant hour
in Benghazi and in Libya when the knowledge was available of what was going on.
But at no time was there a protest that got out of control. At no time and in
no way was a video involved.
This was a preplanned terrorist attack. Again, within two
hours of it a group -- a terrorist group -- was claiming credit for it. The CIA
station chief sent an e-mail directly to the White House Situation Room (and
the State Department did, too) while they're watching it in real time, on
video. This administration knows full well what happened. I guess they're
trying to give the president plausible deniability by saying:
"Well, there's so many e-mails coming in from so many
outposts all over the world. It's impossible to sift through these things
immediately and inform the president." They're trying to establish
plausible deniability or ignorance. "He couldn't have known!"
Somebody did, and whoever knew either didn't think it was that big a deal or is
lying through their teeth. There are only two explanations for this, folks.
I want to tell you right now, there are only two
explanations for this entire sordid affair. One is gross, unbelievable,
incalculable incompetence. Two is sheer, bald-faced lying. Those are the only
two explanations for what happened here and what didn't happen. Gross, corrupt incompetence
or abject lying. What we're watching here today is the equivalent of Woodward
and Bernstein helping Nixon cover up Watergate. That is what is happening today
with this story.
The mainstream media is Woodward and Bernstein.
Watergate is Benghazi.Except this time, Woodward and
Bernstein are helping Nixon cover it up.
Now, why are the media behaving as though they're Woodward
and Bernstein helping Nixon in his cover-up? 'Cause that's what's going on
here! The media, think of them as Woodward and Bernstein, think of this
Benghazi story as Watergate, and they're helping Nixon cover it up. Why? Like I
told you: I think they're barely holding things together. I think it's all
started to unravel at a rapid rate for the White House.
And I think they're having trouble keeping up with it.
And nobody -- nobody -- wants to take the fall for this.
Hillary doesn't want to take the fall. This is a disaster, folks! This was not
necessary now. At least two lives could have been saved. The last two people
died well into this seven-hour attack. There was no effort made to save or
defend or to protect any of the 30 people that were there, and nobody wants to
take the fall for this.
Hillary doesn't want to take the fall for it.
Obama clearly doesn't.
Nobody else in this White House wants to take the fall for
this.
Especially -- especially -- if Obama loses the election. In
fact, that's why I think we know about this. You know, CBS first had this,
Sharyl Attkisson. Somebody leaked these e-mails to her from the regime, and
then Reuters got 'em. And Reuters ran a story that you and I would write about
this. In a random act of journalism, Reuters unbelievably tells the truth about
this. Somebody inside the White House, somebody in the regime is protecting
themselves and getting this stuff out there now, 'cause there's a lot of people
are not gonna take the fall for this, especially if Obama loses.
CNN is now reporting
this story, and they're talking to some reporter from TIME Magazine over there,
and I just caught a little bit of it.
The TIME Magazine reporter said there was no protest. He made a point to say there was no protest. Of course there wasn't. There wasn't a protest. He also detailed the weapons, AK-47s, RPGs,
rocket-propelled grenades. Everybody
knows, folks, everybody knows exactly what happened here. Everybody knows the White House and President
Obama covered this up. Everybody knows he's lying about it being a video and a
protest. Everybody knows that Jay Carney's lying, they just say, "Well,
it's too close to the election. There's so many other stories we have to cover.
We really can't get into this," but it is going to trickle out, and it is
going to become widely known and it is devastating, and, as I say, the only two
explanations, gross, corrupt, malfeasance, incompetence, or lying. Full-fledged, coordinated, strategic lying.
- Make sense? This was actually a transcript from Rush Limbaugh today...